"This work investigates Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet', one of the exemplary heteronormative love stories in Western culture. The three protagonists and Laertes are given the task of proving their political and sexual legitimacy by avenging their respective fathers. It argues that the fear of bastardy haunts the three plays in different forms. This paper seeks to examine the different approaches to dead-father-living-son ambivalent dynamics of recognition and denial in these three revenge tragedies. In the three plays under scrutiny, the questions of legitimacy and succession to the throne are intertwined with the domestic theme of dead-father- living-son relationship. The son should observe the tradition to be accepted as king. It does not tolerate deviations and ruptures. Nussbaum, “devotion and obedience to a good father” (227) are “monarchical emotions.” (Ibid) Monarchy is based on different forms of continuity. Filial obedience is central to the politics of monarchy. ![]() He should fulfil the commands of the father and preserve his legacy. The son should end this usurpation by avenging the father. In the three plays, the place of the father is usurped by another man who has a hand in his death. The act of revenge is a restoration of the father’s legacy. It falls to the son to fulfill the command of the dead father in order to prove his legitimacy. According to Marjorie Garber, revenge can sometimes be an act of homage. The dead father is never appeased until the blood of the killers is spilled by the living son. In the three plays, the father of the tragic hero is murdered and his restless soul haunts the world of the living in different forms to seek revenge. However, instead of that, we should try to find the answer to any situation as it will make us feel good, and also we will save our energy by not wasting it on worries.The Libation Bearers by Aeschylus, King Oedipus by Sophocles and Hamlet by William Shakespeare are domestic tragedies in which the dead father plays a central role. The wise man story conclusion shows that this story played a very significant role by teaching its readers a lesson that worrying is not the solution to any problem. The wise man's story moral is that you should not worry about your problems because by worrying, you will not be able to solve them instead, you will waste your time and energy. The people enthusiastically nodded in agreement with the wise man and dispersed. " Worrying more won't bring you any solution but will simply waste your time and energy, " the wise man explained to them. They decide to correct their errors after realising them. The wise man finally responded, " You can't laugh at a joke multiple times, then what makes you cry at a problem over and over again? "įinally, those in his immediate vicinity understood the intelligent man. On the other hand, they kept glaring at him and asking what it was. No one even smiled when the wise man repeated the joke again and again. Only a handful of them smiled when the wise man repeated it. He then told them a joke, which caused everyone to laugh. ![]() The wise man became upset but did nothing. The people came every day and kept asking about the same problem. But those men didn't understand that correctly, so they kept returning and asking the same question. The knowledgeable man gave them appropriate guidance. One by one, people started complaining about their problems. People Gathered and Interacting with the Wise Man
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |